National Review's Patrick Brennan joins host Greg Corombos. Today's topics: Trey Gowdy interrogates Jonathan Gruber, Bob Kerrey slams the Senate's highly partisan CIA report, and telling tales about the Dear Leader's temper tantrums.
Brennan's reversal: Enhanced interrogation saved lives
Nearly two years ago, John Brennan faced a confirmation hearing in the friendly, Democrat-controlled Senate, but not one entirely ready to rubber-stamp his nomination to become CIA Director after David Petraeus' abrupt departure. The Senate Intelligence Committee pressed Brennan for his views on Bush-era enhanced interrogation techniques during his tenure as deputy CIA Director, to which he had previously given mild support. Brennan dutifully retreated from his previous position, claiming that a read of the panel's draft report had given him pause. "I don't know what the truth is," Brennan told the panel and said that he now questioned his previous briefings on the matter.
That should have given Brennan a wide opening to embrace the report from the panel's Democratic majority yesterday. Instead, Brennan reversed himself — again — and defended his agency, insisting that the information gathered from EITs stopped terrorist attacks and saved lives:
Now that he leads the CIA, Brennan has returned to his original conclusion: the truth is on his agency's side. In a statement responding to the public release of the report's official summary Tuesday, Brennan defended his agency — and the fruits of severe interrogation practices.
Enhanced interrogation techniques "did produce intelligence that helped thwart attack plans, capture terrorists, and save lives," Brennan said, citing an unreleased internal CIA review.
"The intelligence gained from the program," he added, "was critical to our understanding of al Qaeda and continues to inform our counterterrorism efforts to this day."
That steps on the message that Democrats wanted to send yesterday — that the Bush era had nothing to do with them, and that any intelligence wins on Barack Obama's watch were his alone. That's the entire point of this exercise, after all. Dianne Feinstein and her panel pushed the report out before the Republican majority that voters just elected could stop them from releasing their cherry-picked conclusions.
That's not just my opinion on the matter. It's also the opinion of Bob Kerrey, former Democratic Senator from Nebraska, a one-time presidential contender, and most importantly a member of the Senate Intelligence panel during the years in question. Kerrey took to the pages of USA Today to scold his former colleagues for their partisan and political attack on the CIA...
Also read:
Maybe it's a blessing in disguise most of the press has ignored Gruber's comments before now
Gruber Showcases Democrats' Own '47 Percent' Philosophy
Rev. Al Sharpton's finances are coming into question after a report by the New York Times. Plus, the fallout continues from the Gruber tapes!
National Review's Jim Geraghty joins host Greg Corombos. Today's topics: Another Jonathan Gruber video puts the lie to Obama's claim that he was just "some adviser"; political and media excitement in anticipation of riots in Ferguson, Missouri; and a new race-baiting ad from Mary Landrieu accuses Bill Cassidy and Bobby Jindal of...race-baiting?
Former WH official: Gruber 'an important figure' in putting ObamaCare together
In a well-reasoned piece in Bloomberg, Dave Weigel suggests that Democrats have put themselves in a tough position with their initial, panicked response to the discovery of the first six plus videos featuring MIT professor Jonathan Gruber making impolitic but honest statements about the Affordable Care Act and the intelligence of the American voter.
"I don't know who he is," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi unconvincingly replied when asked about the prolific health care policy wonk.
"The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run," Barack Obama later insisted.
"It's sad to me that good political journalists are spending so much time on these irrelevant comments by this guy Gruber," Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) fired off in a tweet nearly as dismissive and condescending as the Gruber's original comments.
The more honest Democrats with ties to the White House know they're caught in a trap, and struggling will only make the snare grow tighter.
With that grim reality in mind, Barack Obama's "Car Czar," Steve Rattner, appeared on MSNBC on Tuesday where he did the White House no favors amid their increasingly flailing effort to create some artificial distance between the administration and the policy analyst to whom they are so inexorably tied.
"I think if you go back to The Washington Post or The New York Times, or anything from that period, you will find Jonathan Gruber's name all over it," Rattner said.
The Weekly Standard's John McCormack apparently took Rattner's advice. When New York Magazine columnist Jonathan Chait conceded that "Gruber designed Obamacare conceptually" but that "he played no direct role in writing the law," McCormack noted that the Times reported quite the opposite.
"After Mr. Gruber helped the administration put together the basic principles of the proposal, the White House lent him to Capitol Hill to help Congressional staff members draft the specifics of the legislation," New York Times reporter Catherine Rampell wrote in 2012...
Also read:
Gruber: GOP Governors' Refusal to Expand Medicaid 'Almost Awesome In Its Evilness', Blames 'Racial Reasons'
Gruber's 'Remarkable Hubris' Denounced By...Jay Carney?