Greg welcomes guests Rob Long and Donna Feldman.
'History is old': Atlantic writer blames Framers for 'constitutional malfunction'
@Lachlan This article is an intellectually dishonest piece of junk. And I'm being kind.
— Suze (@suze109) November 18, 2014
And we'd expect nothing less from the likes of The Atlantic:
Imperfect union: The Constitution didn't foresee a divided government http://t.co/4qYjxqdQ1l pic.twitter.com/wsi803XXfl
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) November 18, 2014
Wait … what?
Is this a serious assertion? Holy shit. @TheAtlantic
— Charly J. (@chuck_dizzle) November 18, 2014
Oh, it's a serious assertion, all right. More from writer Garrett Epps, who just so happens to be a constitutional law professor:
How does the coming duel between legislative and executive branch fit into the design of our Constitution?
The answer to the last question is easy. What’s coming will be painful, frustrating, and dangerous - and it will illustrate a constitutional malfunction unforeseen in 1787. The country will survive, and it's possible it can even make progress - but at tremendous cost in polarization and missed opportunity. The country is like a car driving with the handbrake on: Any movement forward will be accompanied by smoke and internal damage.
So we might profitably put a six-month moratorium on paeans to the wisdom of the Framers. The problem of divided government is a bug, not a feature, and the Constitution itself provides no guidance on how to work around it.Yeah, those Framers really screwed the pooch on that whole Constitution thing!
This is so historically illiterate it boggles the mind http://t.co/0pJoeeosFo pic.twitter.com/JtzBDtbdUN
— Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) November 18, 2014
Yeah, that is bad. RT @lachlan: This is so historically illiterate it boggles the mind http://t.co/0zIzVI3JNu pic.twitter.com/OQmn1cah4F
— Christy Lynn (@ChristyLynnLSU) November 18, 2014
@lachlan If only the men who wrote the Constitution had written some sort of explanation of the philosophy & reasoning behind it. If only...
— DrewMTips (@DrewMTips) November 18, 2014
Gosh, what were they thinking?
@chuck_dizzle That's amazing.
— Amelia (@AmeliaHammy) November 18, 2014
@chuck_dizzle History is old
— Natevember (@NathanWurtzel) November 18, 2014
It's old, and therefore wrong.
Isn't it great how much smarter we are than they? So great. @lachlan
— Drew Belsky (@DJB627) November 18, 2014
@DJB627 What's really funny, and also awful, is that they think they're so much smarter than us. @lachlan
— Ashten Whited (@ashtenthinks) November 18, 2014
Yep - this ridiculous idea of "after, thus smarter." Maybe that's why libs abort their children. Too threatening. @ashtenthinks @Lachlan
— Drew Belsky (@DJB627) November 18, 2014
Ohhhh...
No comments:
Post a Comment