THE NARRATIVE AND POLITICAL CORRECTNESS


Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen. -George Orwell
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

TRIFECTA: YOU BE THE SPEAKER, PART 2





 photo 1f9507f4-f5cc-4773-abbb-1447d89d8ef9_zps657594e7.jpg

THIS DAY IN TWITCHY: JANUARY 6, 2015



Did Eric Boehlert accidentally encourage the MSM to investigate the Bill Clinton-Jeffrey Epstein connection?



So NOW Mayor Rahm Emanuel is getting tough on crime?




'Unembarrassable'? Why was Al Sharpton's Viagra prescription found in Sandy Rubenstein's home?


'Old dude Viagra lobbying group?' Jeb Bush's new PAC sparks facepalms, snickers





Jeb Bush opens deposit window at #RightToRise website to skeptical customers




Shocked faces, activate! John Boehner will live to bang the gavel another day



'You kinda suck, you know that?' Luke Russert lowers the bar for journalism







'As soon as I finish vomiting': Andrea Tantaros holds caption contest for Boehner/Pelosi smooch





'Dear John'? Kissy Boehner and Pelosi get a Nicholas Sparks makeover

'More machine than man now': Harry Reid fought the treadmill — and 'the treadmill won'




Michelle Malkin, blocked by Lena Dunham, makes #sadface; Live Twitter chat goes on







 photo ae3d5a07-4075-484d-99b7-01dbe43557cf_zps1756824c.jpg

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

THREE MARTINI LUNCH: JANUARY 6, 2015

National Review's Jim Geraghty joins host Greg Corombos. Today's topics: The GOP majority across Capitol Hill, the GOP's anti-amnesty strategy, and newly re-elected N.Y. Rep. Chris Gibson announces his impending retirement.



Anatomy of a Failed Coup
Around 10 a.m. this morning, Representative John Fleming (R., Md.) received a phone call from a colleague asking him to vote against Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) on the House floor today.
Fleming has a longstanding alliance with Representative Steve King (R., Iowa), Representative Jim Bridenstine (R., Okla.), and other ringleaders of the unsuccessful effort to oust Boehner from the speaker's chair, which makes it surprising that this was the first time anyone had contacted him about the issue.
"To ask me to vote against the speaker on the last day like this, without having an alternative to vote for, without really having a chance to vet that person and debate this and discuss this, I said, was just a really bad idea," Fleming told National Review Online, explaining why he voted to confirm Boehner as House speaker. "If we're going to change leadership, we need to do it in a very systematic and organized way."
Fleming's experience is indicative of the disorganization that characterized the coup attempt. And it points to a second problem: the lack of a top-tier alternative - someone such as House Ways and Means Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) - willing to rally the opposition against Boehner. Ultimately, those factors combined with the difficulties inherent in challenging a sitting speaker, sinking the coup.
"We should have done all of that after the election, and then in December, that's when we should have had the battle over who should be speaker," Fleming says.
Given the risks involved and the difficulty in finding a candidate, it's perhaps more surprising that the rebels convinced 24 Republicans to vote against Boehner than it is that they came up short. One Republican congressman said that the results today actually understate the conference's interest in new leadership.
"People - especially activists - hate Boehner," the lawmaker, who voted for Boehner in order to guarantee that House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) wouldn't get a chance to become speaker, told NRO. "It's the most unpopular vote most of us will ever take."
Also read:

Why So Many Republicans Wouldn't Vote for Boehner as Speaker

Will Speaker Boehner Punish Dissidents?

 photo McCroskey1_zps17ea25b3.jpg

TRIFECTA: YOU BE THE SPEAKER, PART 1





 photo 1f9507f4-f5cc-4773-abbb-1447d89d8ef9_zps657594e7.jpg

Thursday, December 11, 2014

THREE MARTINI LUNCH: DECEMBER 11, 2014

National Review's Jim Geraghty joins host Greg Corombos. Today's topics: Josh Earnest stumbles defending drone strikes, Elizabeth Warren slams the House budget bill, and the president of Smith College apologizes for saying "All Lives Matter."



College president apologizes after offending students by saying "all lives matter"
I'm glad she walked it back. It's a pretty outrageous statement.
Between garbage like this, Star Chamber justice for students accused of crimes, and the cost of tuition, why would any kid go to college anymore? Ah, right: Because we as a society agreed at some point that a B.A. is a prerequisite for any job more exalted than fry cook. If you want to work, you do your time at drunken sleepaway camp.
Carry on, then.
"We are united in our insistence that all lives matter," read the e-mail, in which [Smith College President Kathleen McCartney] made clear she was strongly behind the [Eric Garner/Michael Brown] protests, writing that the grand jury decisions had "led to a shared fury… We gather in vigil, we raise our voices in protest."
But she soon received backlash from students for her phrasing. They were offended that she did not stick with the slogan "black lives matter."…
In response to student backlash, McCartney apologized in another campus-wide email Friday, saying she had made a mistake "despite my best intentions."…
"I regret that I was unaware the phrase/hashtag 'all lives matter' has been used by some to draw attention away from the focus on institutional violence against Black people," she wrote.
Only by reading the two e-mails she sent out can you appreciate how stupidly Orwellian the backlash was. Some critics of the protests had been answering the "black lives matter" slogan with the phrase "all lives matter." McCartney, who was palpably not being critical — she announced a vigil for Garner and Brown in her first e-mail and refers to herself in the second as a "white ally" — unwittingly used the same phrase to make the protesters' point, i.e. that Garner's and Brown's lives shouldn't matter less because they're black. Her sympathy couldn't have been clearer. She got flamed anyway. Says Charles Cooke, "a woman just apologized for having failed to repeat a mantra that she didn't know existed."
I don't know how to explain the impulse to punish someone who's straining to show that she's on your side except as an artifact of petty totalitarianism. It's not enough that one doesn't share the forbidden sentiment; one mustn't speak it aloud either, even inadvertently, for fear that someone who hears it will misunderstand and then they'll share the forbidden sentiment. The virus must be contained...
Also read:

Joe Scarborough: I can't wait for the eventual Senate report on Obama's drone program

When Democrats do it, it's not a government shutdown

 photo 2ab36fd5-ff25-4e85-bc61-d68aee4ec26c_zps62e3df2f.jpg

Thursday, May 8, 2014

THIS DAY IN TWITCHY: MAY 7, 2014



'To the Left, four corpses are a punchline': Mo. state rep sicko repulses with gross Benghazi 'joke'


'Really classless': Kansas City Star columnist encourages Mo. state rep's mockery of Benghazi dead


Dana Loesch shreds Mo. lawmaker Sicko Newman for soulless Benghazi 'joke'



'Beyond disgraceful': 'Bering Sea Gold' star Kevin Jupina calls out twisted Mo. Rep. Newman


Benghazi is a punchline, sicko? Here is a devastating reminder for twisted Mo. lawmaker



'Pervert' Democrat makes Benghazi masturbation joke...yes, you just read that



'Vagina warrior' candidate reaps the whirlwind after perverted Benghazi joke




Harry Reid continues cuckoo pants Koch obsession; Blames for climate change


'That can't be real': James Woods floored by first lady's attempt at hashtag diplomacy




A 'small symbolic victory': Lois Lerner held in contempt of Congress







Friday, April 4, 2014

RED EYE - MARCH 27, 2014



TV's Andy Levy hosts and welcomes guests Kennedy, Joe DeVito and Buck Sexton.

Democrat Jim Moran: Lawmakers Need Pay Raise to Afford Their D.C. Lifestyle
The veteran Virginia Democrat, who will retire at the end of this year, said many in the House and Senate struggle to support their families at home while maintaining a residence in or near Washington, D.C.
"There are too many members living and sleeping in their offices and it's wrong. They can't afford to live here and it's wrong," Moran told fellow members of the House Appropriations Committee, according to The Hill.
Moran said he realizes the American public would most likely not support a plan to beef up salaries at the Capitol, but he sees it as an important step. His idea is to provide a housing allowance to members of Congress so that they can more easily afford to live in the District and its surrounding areas.
Rep. Tom Cole, an Oklahoma Republican in charge of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee, said Moran's plan would not go very far.
"You won't get a lot of votes but you will make a lot of friends," Cole said.
There is currently a wage freeze on lawmakers in Washington.
Cole is working on the Legislative Branch Spending Bill, which would keep lawmakers from getting a raise. But the bill does contain $3.3 billion in funding for the Capitol Building, House operations, and other agencies such as the U.S. Capitol Police and the Library of Congress.
Congressional salaries have been frozen since 2010, but regular members still pull in $174,000 per year - more than triple the 2013 median U.S. household income of $52,000. Leadership positions are compensated higher.  As far as I'm concerned they should all be following the lead of responsible lawmakers like Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R., Utah), and others who sleep in their offices.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

THE SHUTDOWN: CUI BONO "TO WHOSE BENEFIT?"



On September 28, House Republicans voted to fund the government at current spending levels while strengthening our economy and protecting millions of American families by defunding ObamaCare.

Senate Democrats killed the bill, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it.

That same day, House Republicans voted on H.J. Resolution 59 to keep the government open at current spending levels while protecting our economy by delaying ObamaCare for one year and repealing the tax on medical devices like pacemakers and children's hearing aides.

Senate Democrats killed the bill, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it, causing the government shutdown.



On September 30, the House GOP again voted to fund the government at current spending levels, while ensuring that Congress doesn't receive special treatment under ObamaCare, and delaying ObamaCare's individual mandate.

Again, Senate Democrats killed the measure in the Senate, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto.

That same night, Republicans in the House voted to request a formal House-Senate conference, so Democrats and Republicans could sit down at the table and negotiate to resolve their differences.

Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats, eager to implement the Dear Leader's shutdown strategy, defeated that resolution, and Dear Leader threatened to veto it.



On October 2, in an effort to help reopen parts of the government while Democrats refused to negotiate, House Republicans passed H.J. Res. 71 by voice vote, which would have restored funding for the government of the District of Columbia.

Senate Democrats blocked the bill, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it.

That same day, while Democrats refused to come to the table and work out differences, the House GOP voted to restore funding for the nation's parks and museums – including the World War II Memorial in Washington that has been closed to visiting veterans.

Senate Democrats killed the bill, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it.



Also on October 2, the House GOP tried to help restore funding for vital cancer research and other lifesaving innovations, by voting to reopen the National Institute of Health.

Senate Democrats blocked the bill (see Harry Reid ask a reporter "why would we want to do that?" when asked if he would vote to resume funding for children's cancer treatment), and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it. 



The following day, in order to make sure that the Obama/Reid shutdown doesn't get in the way of paying our National Guard and Reserve, the House GOP voted for the Pay Our Guard and Reserve Act.  The GOP also voted to provide immediate funding for vital veterans benefits and services during the government shutdown.

Senate Democrats blocked both bills, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto them.


On October 4, the House GOP voted to provide immediate funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to ensure Americans have access to emergency responders in the case of a disaster.

Senate Democrats blocked the bill, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it. 




That same day, the House GOP voted to provide immediate funding for nutritional assistance for nearly 9 million low-income mothers and children.

Senate Democrats blocked the bill, and the Dear Leader threatened to veto it.


 
Why would Obama, Reid and their malevolent minions refuse to fund these programs?  Because they feel that it is politically advantageous for them to do so.  The whole purpose of Obama's shutdown theater is to demonize Republicans as a prelude to the 2014 midterm elections.  They rely on the obedient stenographers of the Establishment Media to handle the PR campaign for them.  If you want to know who is truly responsible for this fiasco, ask yourself this question: "Who benefits?"

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

SCHUMER: "I CAN HAZ A CONSPIRACY THEORY..."



Chuck Schumer has got it all figured out in his head.  It's all a gigantic conspiracy...
If anyone is surprised about the government shutdown, Sen. Chuck Schumer said the tea party had it planned "almost a year and a half."
"The tea party was planning almost a year and a half before it happened. The issue of Obamacare is almost incidental. The real issue is they have almost a principle that they wanted to shut down the government because they hate it so, and that’s astounding," Schumer said on CNN's "New Day."
Schumer went further to say it was "meticulously" planned and that Speaker John Boehner has conceded to go along with it.
"So anyone who thinks this is an accident that, 'Oh, the president is equally to blame,' oh no, the tea party planned this and very, very, very meticulously and so far successfully executed it, assuming Speaker Boehner would go along with them, which unfortunately was a correct assumption,” Schumer (D-NY) said.
Meanwhile, in other conspiracy news, Harry Reid, Carl Bernstein and Jay Carney are very concerned that the liberal media is also "in on it" and that members of the press corps need to get back to being loyal stenographers for the Dear Leader and other high-ranking party apparatchiks.

Monday, September 30, 2013

CNN POLL: 49% BLAME OBAMA FOR A SHUTDOWN



As the battle over ObamaCare continues, a new CNN poll shows the public more or less evenly split between blaming the GOP and the Dear Leader if the dispute causes a government shutdown tomorrow.

The CNN/ORC International poll released Monday morning shows that while 46% would blame congressional Republicans for the government shutdown, 49% would assign either all or some of the blame to Obama.

More significantly, the poll shows a move toward blaming Obama following a similar survey conducted earlier in the month.  As CNN reports:
"The number who would hold congressional Republicans responsible has gone down by 5 points since early September, and the number who would blame Obama is up 3 points in that same time," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Those changes came among most demographic groups."
The CNN poll is similar to a CBS News/New York Times survey released late last week that indicated 44% blaming congressional Republicans and 35% pointing fingers at the president. Two other polls conducted in the past week and a half, from Pew Research Center and United Technologies/National Journal, showed a much closer margin but their questions mentioned Republicans in general rather than the GOP in Congress.
Could Ted Cruz's 21-hour talkathon have moved the needle in the GOP's favor?  It's quite likely, whether the Establishment Media is willing to admit it or not.  As CNN acknowledges, other polls have shown the blame to be more equally shared. And even in this poll, independents are evenly divided - with 39% pointing the finger at Republicans and 38% at Obama.

The CNN poll also shows that 57% oppose Obamacare itself – up 3 points since May – compared to only 38% who support it. Independents oppose the law by 67-27 percent.

In a separate question, 47% of all people in the poll say that Obama is acting like a spoiled child in the budget battle.  Also, 58% say congressional Democrats are acting like spoiled children.  This indicates that there is plenty of blame to go around.  It's not just a Republican problem.  Only the biased media and the Democrats they support are making that bogus claim.

Obviously the media is spinning furiously on behalf of their creature, Obama.  But as Mike Flynn points out:
Democrats and the media are convinced that the public will "blame" Republicans for the looming government shutdown. This is predicated on memories that Republicans were "blamed" for the last government shutdown, in 1995-96. The media certainly did "blame" the GOP at the time for causing the shutdown. The voters, however, didn't seem to have the same view. Just months later, at the next election, the Republicans retained their majorities in Congress. The Senate GOP even picked up 2 seats, in a year in which Clinton won reelection.
President Clinton did win reelection that year, but it was with less than a majority of the vote. In other words, a majority of Americans voted against Bill Clinton in the three-way presidential race. Democrats stayed roughly even in the House and lost ground in the Senate.
Senate Republicans went into the 1996 election with 53 seats in the Senate. They emerged with 55. In the House, the Republicans lost just two seats, retaining their majority. The conventional wisdom today is that the GOP "suffered" as a result of the shutdown. The party should be so lucky this year.
All of this was at a time that the three broadcast networks and mainstream media could unilaterally dictate the political conversation. In 1996, they used this power to bludgeon the GOP over the shutdown and did eventually get the party to cave and agree to Clinton's budget terms. They have nothing like this power today.
In the months that followed, though, Republicans in Congress secured a balanced budget deal and achieved their long-sought goal to reform welfare. Whatever short-term "blame" they suffered from the shutdown didn't preclude policy and electoral success just months later.
The media may say now that the GOP is committing "political suicide" by pushing demands that threaten a shutdown. But, as the great philosopher Cab Calloway said, "It ain't necessarily so."
That's exactly right.  For those who are wondering what a shutdown does or doesn't do, Heritage answers some frequently asked questions.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

JEFF DUNCAN KICKS JOHN KERRY'S ASS ON SYRIA



John Kerry became flustered and defensive at Wednesday's House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, when Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) pressed him on a potential U.S. military intervention in Syria.  As Kerry attempted to bluster his way out of it by putting on his "how dare you!" faux outrage face, Duncan stood his ground.

Kerry whined quite a bit while refusing to answer Duncan's questions.

The issue, as Duncan rightly pointed out, is credibility - namely the credibility (or, more accurately, the lack of credibility) of the Obama regime.  How can we trust the regime not to get our nation stuck in another country's civil war when discredited limousine liberals like Kerry can't give a straight answer to a question?

Duncan opened his line of questioning by accusing President Barack Obama's administration of having "a serious credibility issue," referencing scandals like Benghazi, Operation Fast and Furious - in which Obama has asserted executive privilege over documents to keep them from Congress - the IRS scandal, the NSA scandal, and the scandal surrounding surveillance of journalists from Associated Press and Fox News reporter James Rosen.

Holding up a photo of the late Tyrone Woods - one of the Benghazi Four who were murdered in a terrorist attack a year ago while their government sat back and left them to die - Duncan asked about the ties between the Benghazi scandal and the situation in Syria.

"The reason that I say Benghazi is germane to our discussion on Syria is this: Secretary Kerry, have there been any efforts on the part of the United States directly or indirectly to provide weapons to the Syrian rebels? That would also include facilitating the transfer of weapons from Libyan rebels to Syrian rebels?"
The New York Times has reported that the Obama administration was running guns to Syria through Libya, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said in a recent interview with Breitbart News that such an operation would haunt then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in a potential bid for president in 2016.

In an exclusive interview with Matthew Boyle of Breitbart News, Duncan gave his impression of Kerry's hysterics:
"He did not answer me," Duncan said. "In fact, he deflected the question and then got a little hostile with me about the chemical weapons used. I never denied the fact that chemical weapons were used in Syria."
"I was just trying to make the point that there is a connection between Benghazi and Syria," he continued, "and that a lot of Americans do believe there was an operation going on to round up the weapons from the Libyan rebels and transport them to Syria. He didn't answer my question."
When his five minutes worth of questioning during the hearing - the standard amount each member is given for question-and-answer with witnesses - ended, Duncan said Kerry "kept riding on."
"I'm surprised Chairman Royce let him go on as long as he did - for about a minute over, which he didn't allow that for anybody else - the screen split and I sat there and held Tyrone Woods's picture up," Duncan said.
Duncan doubts that the House of Representatives has the votes to support a resolution for intervention.  He also expressed disappointment that Boehner and Cantor have both publicly supported Obama's interventionist schemes without even discussing it with their fellow Republicans.

South Carolinians can certainly be proud to have men like Jeff Duncan and Trey Gowdy representing them in the House.  Not only do they "get it" but they have the courage to stand up and speak truth to power.  Well done!