Disrupting the Narrative of the New Left, its allies in Academia, Hollywood and the Establishment Media, and examining with honesty the goals of cultural Marxism and the dangers of reactionary and abusive political correctness.
THE NARRATIVE AND POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
“Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen.”-George Orwell
Friday night in South Carolina, Ted Cruz claimed that he and Marco disagree about defunding Planned Parenthood. The facts in Marco's record say otherwise.
This is a desperate politically motivated attack: Marco has a
sterling pro-life record, has consistently voted to defund Planned
Parenthood, and would make it a priority to protect life as POTUS.
Here's just how dishonest Cruz's attack is: The nonpartisan group
National Right to Life has totally rejected it as "inaccurate and
misleading."
In the craziness of a presidential campaign, sometimes rumors get
started that, with the advent of social media, that take hold and appear
to become gospel - even though they're not true. One such Internet
rumor is the false claim that pro-life Florida Senator Marco Rubio
opposes de-funding Planned Parenthood. This rumor is easy to refute, as
Rubio voted not once but three times in recent months for legislation
to de-fund Planned Parenthood.
Refuting the claim, Jahan Wilcox, a spokesman for Rubio, told TheBlaze: "Marco Rubio has always voted with Tim Scott and Joni Ernst to
defund Planned Parenthood and anything to the contrary is false."
Earlier this year, in exclusive comments to LifeNews.com, Rubio
said he would sign a bill to de-fund the Planned Parenthood abortion
business "immediately" if elected president.
It would be a shame if any pro-life candidate lost an election
over false rumors that he or she is not pro-life when the candidate has
compiled a sterling 100% pro-life voting record, as has Rubio.
On the campaign trail, Teddy claims he is the consistent
conservative who voters can trust. However, whether it's immigration,
foreign policy, trade, agriculture, or marriage, voters have long since
learned that Teddy is more #calculaTED than consistent. Now, as he and
his campaign reach for new lows with a series of outright lies and
questionable tactics, voters are learning that he can't be trusted.
Teddy's recent questionable tactics and outright lies include…
CARSON RUMORS: On Iowa caucus night, the Cruz campaign was accused
of "sabotaging Carson" by passing around rumors he was dropping out of
the race."Dr. Ben Carson and his campaign accused Sen. Ted Cruz's team
of sabotaging Carson in the Iowa caucuses Monday night by encouraging
Cruz supporters to tell voters at their caucus sites – incorrectly –
that Carson was dropping out of the race. 'It was happening all over,'
Iowa State Director Ryan Rhodes told MSNBC. 'One of the precincts Candy
[Carson, the candidate's wife] walked into, she had to correct the
record. She actually walked in, in Ankeny, and gave a speech about no,
he's still in the race and that's a lie.'" (MSNBC, 2/1/16)
LIES ABOUT RUBIO'S STRONG SUPPORT FOR MARRIAGE: Weekly Standard's
Michael Warren: Cruz being "shifty" and not forthright in attacking
others on marriage. CAROL COSTELLO: "I will say Michael the gay marriage
issue is probably very important in a state like South Carolina, and he
wants to get ahead of what Ted Cruz is accusing him of." MICHAEL
WARREN: "That's right. Let's be honest here I mean Cruz is being
somewhat shifty on this at least with regard to Marco Rubio. I mean
Rubio came out after that decision and said that while this is the law
of the land, that he would appoint court appointments who would seek to
overturn this law. So Cruz isn't being quite forthright about this."
(CNN, 2/13/16)
LIES TO COVER-UP HIS OWN SUPPORT FOR JOHN ROBERTS: Told NBC that
because John Roberts "didn't have a track record," he "would not have
nominated" him. CHUCK TODD: "You were a big supporter of him, but in
hindsight you're not. Is that because you think that he didn't have a
track record?" CRUZ: "He didn't have a track record and I would not have
nominated John Roberts. Once George Bush nominated him, I supported the
nomination as a Republican nominee." (NBC's "Meet the Press," 2/14/16)
Back in 2005, however, Teddy supported Roberts and specifically
dismissed the "insufficient record" argument against Roberts since "he
has a far longer record that is relevant: his professional career as a
Supreme Court litigator.""His nomination has been met with widespread
praise, from left and right. Nevertheless, there are some who have
raised complaints that his two years on the bench provide insufficient
record for them to assess (and attack) his jurisprudence. That complaint
misses the mark for three reasons. First, his judicial record would
have stretched 14 years, had Senate Democrats not delayed its
consideration twice, in 1991 and again in 2001. When his nomination did
finally make it to the Senate floor, in 2003, he was confirmed by
unanimous consent. Second, many distinguished jurists, such as Chief
Justices William Rehnquist and Earl Warren and Justices O'Connor,
Souter, and Thomas, similarly had very limited experience on the federal
bench prior to ascending to the Court. And third, although two years on
the bench provides a limited number of opinions, he has a far longer
record that is relevant: his professional career as a Supreme Court
litigator." (Ted Cruz, Op-Ed, "The Right Stuff," National Review,
7/20/05)
PUSH POLLS: Cruz faces allegations of conducting push polls in
South Carolina."Ted Cruz denied all knowledge of robocalls being made
in South Carolina on Thursday after Donald Trump accused the Texas
senator's 'people' of 'doing very sleazy and dishonest "pushpolls" on
me.' ...The episode follows a report by The Washington Post published
earlier in the day that refers to robo-calls to potential voters in
South Carolina that become hostile when the respondent voices support
for a candidate other than Cruz. The Texas senator's campaign denied for
that story that it was responsible for the calls, which said they were
being conducted by Remington Research, the name of the consulting firm
started by Jeff Roe, Cruz's campaign manager." (Politico, 2/11/16)
SOFTCORE PORN AD: Cruz campaign removed an ad from air that
featured a softcore porn star."Ted Cruz's campaign has pulled its most
recent ad, ‘Conservatives Anonymous,' after learning one of the actors
in the spot is also a softcore porn star. The ad, which was set at a
group therapy session of conservative voters who feel betrayed by Marco
Rubio on immigration, featured actor Amy Lindsay, who played a woman
telling another group member, ‘Maybe you should vote for more than just a
pretty face next time.' Lindsay has appeared in several softcore porn
films, including Erotic Confessions, Carnal Wishes, Secrets of a
Chambermaid, and Insatiable Desires." (BuzzFeed, 2/12/16)
And, just today...
ADS TAKEN DOWN: South Carolina television stations pull anti-Marco
ad from pro-Cruz group after legal review."Television stations in South
Carolina have pulled an ad from Stand for Truth, the ‘super PAC'
supporting Senator Ted Cruz, after a legal review. The ad, titled
'Sanctuary,' was a version of an ad the group ran in Iowa, criticizing
Marco Rubio for his record on immigration. … 'We had our legal folks
review it, and it was decided that this needed to be pulled and
substituted,' Randy Ingram, the general manager of WBTW in Myrtle Beach,
S.C., said, although he couldn't recall the specifics of the legal
team's decision. He said other stations in the Media General umbrella,
which includes WCBD in Charleston and WSPA in Greenville/Spartanburg,
also pulled the ad. The decision was made on Friday, and the ad was
pulled from rotation on Saturday." (The New York Times, 2/15/16)
