THE NARRATIVE AND POLITICAL CORRECTNESS


Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen. -George Orwell

Friday, November 16, 2012

WHY LOWER TAXES ARE GOOD FOR EVERYONE















"If we want millionaires to pay more taxes, then we need an economy where there are more millionaires."

As Conservatives already understand, our federal government does not really have a revenue problem.  What it does have is a spending problem.  The runaway spending is a serious problem for our nation.  It must be dealt with ASAP.  But if you want greater revenue then raising taxes is not the solution.  Democrats are functionally illiterate when it comes to economics.  They must have it explained to them, so...  As Stephen Moore explains:
Let's start with the 1920s. All tax rates were cut during the Calvin Coolidge administration, including the top rate, which fell to 25% from the World War I high of 73%. Between 1923 and 1928, benefited by lower tax rates, the economy surged, raising incomes and living standards for the middle class. Tax collections in real terms nearly doubled—and the share of taxes paid by those who made more than $100,000 a year (more than $1 million today) increased to 51% from 28%.

The top tax rate rose to 63% in 1932, to 79% in 1936, and to 90% during World War II. The higher rates persisted after the war, and while the economy grew as the government's economic role ebbed, high rates generally helped to hold back the pace of growth.

Tax rates weren't reduced much until the Kennedy administration. JFK cut rates by about 30% for every income group. He argued that the lower tax rates would "boost the economy, produce revenues, and achieve a future budget surplus." He even called lower rates "an investment in the future."

The Kennedy tax cut was enacted in 1964 (after JFK's assassination), lowering the highest tax rate to 70% from 91%. His prediction that the economy would surge was validated by rapid growth every year from 1965 through 1968. Tax collections grew by 8.6% per year and unemployment fell to 3.4%. "The unusual budget spectacle of sharply rising revenues following the biggest tax cut in history," announced a 1966 U.S. News and World Report article, "is beginning to astonish even those who pushed hardest for tax cuts in the first place."

Americans earning over $50,000 per year (the equivalent of about $250,000 today) increased their tax payments by nearly 40% after the rate cut, according to a report from the Joint Economic Committee of Congress. Their share of overall taxes paid rose to almost 15% in 1966 from 12% in 1963. Americans with an income of more than $1 million nearly doubled their tax payments to $603 million in 1965 from $311 million in 1962.
As Obama is fond of saying: Let's have that discussion...

1 comment:

  1. I've never understood why the Republicans can't or won't drive this point home ad infinitum! We should be relentless in making "Lower taxes means more revenue and more jobs" our mantra. Someone has a golden opportunity in 4 years to preach this fact and to educate the masses. Also, it should be taught that businesses never pay taxes per se. They either pass along the increase by raising the price of their goods, reduce workforce or as is happening now, go out of business altogether (see ObamaCare). Obama isn't interested in having any discussion. He wants business to suffer so as to place an ever increasing populace on the government dole thereby creating his Marxist utopia. I sure hope the House Republicans grow a spine to stop what they can.

    ReplyDelete